The media ridicules people who speak of SRM. It is also called “satanic panic. Wikipedia talks about ‘unsubstantiated cases’ under this heading. The question is why all these ‘unsubstantiated cases’ are actually spoken of since the number of witnesses is immense.
If you want to come out clearly and lucidly with the argument that “there is no such thing as SRM,” surely it would be best to have a thorough, independent investigation done, so that you can explain to the whole society in an informed way that this darkness only arises in human fantasies and that it is pure coincidence that there is so much overlap in stories of people individually.
For one can well wonder how it is possible that so many stories from all over the Netherlands, but also from other countries like Germany, Belgium, Canada, America and England are so similar to each other. And now let’s talk only about the testimonies that came public even before there was the Internet and such fast communication traffic that people could take ghost stories from each other. Intense traumas that surface in survivors, through the terrible re-experiences they have, which make them suddenly “freeze,” for one thing, cannot be made up. And, if it were stagecraft anyway; for what purpose would anyone want to relive traumas?
Even the word “conspiracy thinker” is used to scorn people who want to shed light on this issue. The government has so far not cooperated with an independent investigation, which would do so much justice to over 100 victims. It is then only about those who were brave enough to cooperate anonymously in a thorough investigation. It gives reason to think that the government is doing so much victims, left out in the cold like this and not giving a notion of it.
References for more information
Help je mee troepen te mobiliseren voor gerechtigheid?